Good laboratory practice in India

Technical note:Beyond Good Laboratory Practice

Good Laboratory Practice for optimization research

Graham Kendall*, Ruibin Bai, Jacek Błazewicz, Patrick De Causmaecker, Michel Gendreau, Robert John, Jiawei Li, Barry McCollum, Erwin Pesch, Rong Qu, Nasser Sabar, Greet Vanden Berghe and Angelina Yee University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Malaysia; University of Nottingham Ningbo, Ningbo, China; Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Pola...

Using Provenance to support Good Laboratory Practice in Grid Environments

Conducting experiments and documenting results is daily business of scientists. Good and traceable documentation enables other scientists to confirm procedures and results for increased credibility. Documentation and scientific conduct are regulated and termed as “good laboratory practice.” Laboratory notebooks are used to record each step in conducting an experiment and processing data. Origin...

Frequency of Errors in Clinical Laboratory Practice

  Background and Objective: Laboratory errors are one of the major factors that affect the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and monitoring in patients.The objective of study is to evaluate the frequency and type of errors in different phases of testing at the Pathology Department of the Shalamar Hospital, Lahore and to evaluate the causes of errors. Methods: This observational study was carrie...

Judging the Data: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice Standards

When it comes to assessing the quality of toxicologic data to develop policy decisions, should regulators rely on journal peer review or on Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards? Authors of a review comparing the two conclude that the answer is neither. Instead, they propose that regulators need a well-defined scheme in which the best elements of both processes enable data to be weighed and ...